How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

For example, Jesus has a God …

Considering that the traditions stem from interpretations based off the writings, sola scriptura would be the means to test the coherency of the traditions.

John 20:17] Jesus said to her, “Do not cling to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.’ ”

What does it mean to dream about demons possessing people, and what can be done about this dream that keeps occurring for years?

But it was not until the efforts to create a uniform Christianity at Nicaea that the concept became the accepted tradition, to create a universal (catholic) interpretation of the writings.

Nuda scriptura is scripture alone. Sola scriptura looks at the writings and the traditions, with the writings (source of the traditions) having greater relevance.

The New Testament identifies Jesus. Literally, spelling it out in Acts 3.

Is it true that people who are possessed by demons cannot see them until the demon is cast out? What is the reason for this?

So, how does that affect the Athanasian Christian doctrine of the Trinity?

A Trinity was first mentioned as G-d, His Word and His Wisdom, by Theophilus of Antioch.

But if you read it through the filter of the traditions of a Trinity, you will miss it (like many miss Jesus telling Mary about Mary’s G-d being Jesus’s G-d). That is incoherent.

What movies have not aged well?

Later, Tertullian would lay the foundations of the Trinity.

How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

Read also: